Comments on: Newspapers pimp like biker gangs http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/ A forum mainly for residents of Downtown Toronto Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:49:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Joe Pepe NYC http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/comment-page-1/#comment-14738 Joe Pepe NYC Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:54:06 +0000 http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/#comment-14738 100% accurate. Where is the community outrage? Boycott legit advertisers who advertise in the paper and it will stop. 100% accurate.
Where is the community outrage?
Boycott legit advertisers who advertise in the paper and it will stop.

]]> By: Administrator http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Administrator Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:03:36 +0000 http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/#comment-19 It is clear that "karmacake" is a buffoon. It is clear that “karmacake” is a buffoon.

]]> By: karmacake http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/comment-page-1/#comment-17 karmacake Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:35:36 +0000 http://thetorontobulletin.com/blog/2006/12/12/newspapers-pimp-like-biker-gangs/#comment-17 <p>Your path of thought is honourable albeit flawed in its brash allegations.</p> <p>To find Toronto publications accountable for supporting the sex trade of runaways and broken women is quite the accusation.</p> <p>Publications sell advertising.<br /> Advertising supports the paper.<br /> It is an unreasonable expectation to place upon the publications to ask them to research and to try to identify the missing children apparently lured into the sextrade.</p> <p>That is not their mandate, their mandate is to exist, to report and to survive. For the publications to research their advertisers to find unwilling sextrade workers would be to admit that they are advertising prostitutes.</p> <p>Which sir is illegal.<br /> Hands are tied from the need for revenue, and the necessity to look the other way.</p> <p>I am indifferent to the advertising of sextrade workers. They have existed since the dawn of time. But, obviously you are not. No doubt, right now you are engaged in an passionate search to reunite mother's with their wayward daughters. </p> <p>If you are not, then I count you as a hypocrite and will disregard your meandering blog as nothing more than righteous spewings from an armchair activist. </p> Your path of thought is honourable albeit flawed in its brash allegations.

To find Toronto publications accountable for supporting the sex trade of runaways and broken women is quite the accusation.

Publications sell advertising.
Advertising supports the paper.
It is an unreasonable expectation to place upon the publications to ask them to research and to try to identify the missing children apparently lured into the sextrade.

That is not their mandate, their mandate is to exist, to report and to survive. For the publications to research their advertisers to find unwilling sextrade workers would be to admit that they are advertising prostitutes.

Which sir is illegal.
Hands are tied from the need for revenue, and the necessity to look the other way.

I am indifferent to the advertising of sextrade workers. They have existed since the dawn of time. But, obviously you are not. No doubt, right now you are engaged in an passionate search to reunite mother’s with their wayward daughters.

If you are not, then I count you as a hypocrite and will disregard your meandering blog as nothing more than righteous spewings from an armchair activist.

]]>